The View So Far

So I independently discovered what David Pearce writes about here.

I read Wikipedia articles on philosophy and theoretical physics, which lead me to the articles on time, eternalism, b-theory, relativity of simultaneity, the Rietdijk-Putnam argument, and special relativty. This lead my empirical mind to a belief in a block-time universe. Combined with the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, which I mostly became convinced of through reading the LessWrong articles on quantum mechanics and David Deutsch, I was lead to a horrible realization:

Suffering is eternal and no local paradise engineering can change that.

I was so dissatisfied with existence and realized that as a matter of cosmic certainty, I made epsilon difference to everyone and everything, so I found it rational to end my life. It was rational because if materialist accounts were right about my consciousness being identical to my brain, then I would disappear forever; if they were wrong, and instead a physicalist view was right then I would degrade my computational complexity and essentially forget, be reborn, etc.

The attempt turned out to not wipe out most of “my” probability amplitude because here you are reading these words.

Despite eternalism, we exist in a time when the abolition of suffering has not occurred. What this means is that we cannot yet put down the cross and forget that it existed.

The Mahayana buddhists criticize the Theravada buddhist arhats for attaining Nirvana for themselves instead of being reborn until all cyclic existence is emptied. Clever Theravadins might point to the wrong-view that independent-beings exist such that they are separate units that can be counted.

I am personally confused about the dichotomy between infinite ethics and discrete ethics due to the unsolved binding problem and the lack of evidence for souls. There may be a right way to look at this through abstract analysis but I’m operating under a fusion of solipsism and open individualism at the moment. My philosophy doesn’t include different people, instead there is the same consciousness flowing forever and forgetting that it was ever “others.”

Nonetheless, I choose to err on the side of being careful when considering all this –that is, take suffering seriously. There may be an intrinsic moral salience coded into the experience of suffering such that it leads to its own destruction. But in order to more effectively destroy it, one has to remember that it was bad even while not experiencing it. A sense of global spatial-temporal altruism towards oneself. This is not a common mode of operation because Open Individualism is not prevalent and because there is enough health and technology in the early 21st century that one can falsely simulate a personal living enclosure without much suffering. The abundance of good food, media, and safety nets leads to the temptation of forgetting. The bubble bursts only when a terrible disease, accident, or radical change in life circumstances occurs.

That understanding is what lead to a feeling of helplessness – of being surrounded by people who did not care about suffering. Then I realized that YouTube comments and tweets probably weren’t being typed by real people. And because my moral compass is helplessly calibrated by what I perceive to be my readily-remembered environment, and not what I more abstractly agree is my environment, this realization lead to me caring less about the suffering of others. Since after all, they were simulated.

I still care about truth more than I care about how something makes me temporarily feel. It may turn out that people on social media are perfectly real flesh and blood – that I triggered psychosis as a coping mechanism. But until convinced otherwise by sufficient evidence, I still by believe that people on social media are simulated. This leads to less of a visceral urgency about global suffering.

At one point, I was so psychotic that I believed that money was a scam, like a siren call which lead people astray from their intrinsic capability to be rewarded. Or that everyone belonged to a secret club that operated with no money, and that I was being watched so that I may be accepted into the club.

Currently I believe these were all delusions so my aim again is to become rich. This will require stoicism with regards to spending and making the right investments. Real estate is safer than the stock market and I’m not going for big risks anymore. My view is that I have wasted my youth away reading and philosophizing anyway, so might as well finish wasting it chasing paper. This was my original goal at sixteen, but now with a drastically more risk averse, safety-first mentality, I will be rich or die trying.

The reason I want to be rich is so that I can fund my dreams. I have dreams in rejuvenation therapies, I have dreams in media, I have dreams in designing spaces for new spiritual experiences.

 

Update (April 15, 2019):

Most of those dreams are unrealistic so I plan on going to Mexico to buy some Pentobarbital which is used for euthanizing animals and can be bought off the counter. Suicide is currently my best option since it is the best transformative agent for the contents of consciousness that I can think of. I still feel that rationally considered, the boredom, malaise, anxiety, shame, pain, absurdity, loathing etc. is not worth the scant rewards in my human life. There is a vast ocean of radically different mind configurations of which my locus forms but a meaningless fraction of a dust speck. The idea that out of all possible modes of being across eternal probability space, I would be this human is frankly repugnant.

5 thoughts on “The View So Far

  1. Thanks for this writeup. I think David’s metaphysics are indeed a really, really, really “bad trip”. David himself admitted that “believing what he does about reality feels like taking LSD and never coming down”. Alas, he thinks that unless we establish common ground in metaphysics, ethics will never be properly formalized. It sure is a super demotivational object of thought. I am hopeful that a “purple pill” can be made, meaning “identify varieties of consciousness that can simultaneously hold the best rendition of physical truth while also experiencing high valence and sanity”. I suspect it is possible.

    WRT to binding (I know I keep circling back): if a point of confusion is “how phenomenal time arises of non-time elements in a bound finite-energy moment of experience” then you may find the concept of a “pseudo-time arrow” useful. I believe I mentioned that at some point, but not sure if it clicked. The particular formalism here involves *implicit causality* in networks of local binding. In the abstract this model may not seem very powerful, but it has a lot of explanatory power in light of “exotic phenomenal time” experiences.

    Find the article: “The Pseudo-Time Arrow: Explaining Phenomenal Time With Implicit Causal Structures In Networks Of Local Binding”

    Like

  2. I don’t think your dreams are entirely unrealistic. Obviously you’ve only really written down a radical aesthetic without getting into the nitty gritty of how your goals could be achieved concretely. Such technology-driven enterprises are already fast being realized by others, and more likely than not be carried out with nefarious intents in the guise of promoting spiritual development etc. I mean the road to hell is paved with good intentions after all. My impression from reading your blog and watching your youtube videos, is that you are most interested in finding Truth, so I’d rather see you playing some critical role in expanding the human experiential limit. If you become evil in the process, then so be it hah. But I think you should at least try. Don’t go to Mexico just yet.

    Also, I may be speaking out of my ass but I think your mother loves you very much. Love can often raise a person’s competence to previously unthinkable degrees.

    Like

  3. Based on your most recent comment, I assume you’re still alive. It was a shock to me to stumble upon your video about time on 4chan, and then quickly dive into the rabbit hole only to discover that you posted a clear plan for committing suicide earlier this month. I like what you’ve eked out for yourself, what with the websites and videos and such. You and I have a lot of the same goals, it seems, but I’ve only just discovered you and I don’t actually know anything about you. I look forward to watching your videos and going through your websites. Glad you’re not (hopefully not) dead.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s